Notes on Voluntary Silence
Silence is not the absence of speech. It is a decision that speech has been postponed.
Essay · Abdirahman Yusuf · Steward of River House · September 2020
We keep silence before noon[1]. Six people, one kitchen, no talking. It sounds austere and is mostly comic: an elaborate pantomime about the kettle, conducted daily by adults.
The value is not mystical. In ordinary conversation a great deal of what we say is maintenance — reassurance that the relationship persists. Remove the maintenance for four hours and you discover how much of your speech was load-bearing and how much was upholstery.
Some people find the first morning frightening. That is worth saying plainly, because our literature has a tendency to describe difficulty as depth. It is not depth. It is difficulty, and it passes for most people by the fourth day, and for some it does not pass and they should stop.
We do not believe silence purifies anyone. We believe it postpones the sentence you were going to say, long enough for you to notice why you were going to say it.
A visitor asked me last spring whether the silence was ever used as a punishment[2]. I said no. I have thought about the question every week since, which I suspect was its purpose.
Sources
Each numbered reference above is traceable to a document held in the Common Record or to a page preserved from an earlier system. Where a source is held in part, that is stated.
- [1]
PRO/1996/11
House Handbook: Order of a Weekly Observance
Procedure · 1996 · Stewardship
The order of silence as printed in the house handbook.
Standing: HeldReturn to the passage
- [2]
OH/2004/07
Oral history: Dorothy Hargreaves
Oral history · Recorded 12 June 2004 · North House
An earlier member's recollection of the same question being asked at the North House.
Standing: TranscribedAccess: Open. Consent on file.Return to the passage
Journal of the Continuance Institute · revision 31.8 · this document has been reconciled with the Common Record