COR/2004/077
Letter, the archivist to a member, on the naming of a former property
- Kind:
- Correspondence
- Date:
- 18 May 2004
- Origin:
- North House
- Access:
- Open.
Why the historical name of a property no longer held is omitted from printed material. The reason given is the present owner.
The Continuance Institute · The North House · Penobscot County · Maine
Dear Mr Aleixo —
You ask why the older name does not appear in the printed catalogue, and whether something is being kept from you. Nothing is. The answer is duller than that and I will give it in full.
The land passed out of our hands in 1999 and is now a private residence. When the name was last printed, in a members' circular, the family living there received callers at the door, letters addressed to us, and on one occasion a photographer. They asked us, politely, to stop. We agreed, and the practice has been to omit the name from anything we print.
The earlier public transcriptions omit it as well, which I am told predates the request. I have not been able to establish why, and I would rather say so than invent a reason.
The name is not withheld from members who ask a steward. It is simply not printed. If you would like the papers, write again and I will tell you which boxes to ask for.
Yours, for the archive —
Filed with the standing note on names of properties no longer held.
Catalogued at the North House · reproduction permitted for study · redactions are not itemised