The Continuance Institute
← Journal

The Ethical Use of Attention

If attention is the scarcest thing a person has, then asking for it is a moral act and should be justified.

Essay · Rie Katsuragawa · Steward of Cedar House · January 2025

We speak easily about protecting our own attention. We speak much less about the ethics of requesting other people's, which is a thing all of us do many times a day and almost none of us examine.

A request for attention is a request for a portion of a finite life. That framing sounds heavy until you apply it, at which point it becomes merely practical: it produces shorter letters, fewer meetings, and a marked reduction in the sentence 'I just wanted to run something past you.'

The Institute has a specific exposure here. We ask a great deal of attention from our members — observances, correspondence, review, the long apparatus of participation. Each request is defensible individually. I am less sure about the sum.

An organization is entitled to ask for a person's time. It is not entitled to arrange matters so that the request never has to be made again.

I have proposed to the stewardship that each house publish, annually, the total hours it asks of a full member. The proposal has been received warmly and referred to continuity review, where warm proposals go.

Sources

Each numbered reference above is traceable to a document held in the Common Record or to a page preserved from an earlier system. Where a source is held in part, that is stated.

  1. [1]

    CR-F-0001

    The Founding Letter

    Published record · 1974 · North House

    Vale on what may properly be asked of a member.

    Read aloud at a first attendance. Not amended since adoption.

    Standing: HeldEntered without a reference in the textReturn to the passage

Journal of the Continuance Institute · revision 31.8 · this document has been reconciled with the Common Record